SM Entertainment Bullshit Copyright Claim

🐮💩 Copyright Claim by SM Entertainment

I’d like to share my experience with what I call “copyright infringement abuse.”

Basically, I feel that the YouTube copyright reporting system is seriously flawed. Here’s what happened to me…

Back on September 27th, 2015, I published the following video that used an audio track by Digital Juice called the “Clarion Conspiracy.” Everything was fine for months.

On February 3rd, 2016, I was slapped with a “Copyright Infringement” notice claiming that I had infringed on a song ‘Prologue’ by SM Entertainment, South Korea’s largest K-pop media group that owns some of the biggest names in K-pop (e.g. Girls Generation, EXO and Super Junior). Their claim was that the ‘Clarion Conspiracy’ audio track that I used was copyrighted to them.

Naturally, I disputed this claim but after some time, SM Entertainment escalated the claim and even though I submitted proof that I had bought the audio track from Digital Juice, SM Entertainment filed a takedown notice against my video.

Disputing the false claim
Proof of original composer: Alexander Michael Davis
SM Entertainment rejects my dispute even with proof provided.
YouTube proceeds to approve the takedown of my video

When I contacted YouTube with all my evidence, YouTube’s official reply was “Please note that YouTube does not mediate copyright disputes.” Even though I sent numerous emails to SM Entertainment through their web mail and directly to their email address, I received no reply.

I then decided to investigate this song “Prologue” that SM entertainment claims is theirs. After searching around the Internet, I found it here at 4:01 minutes in:

Please listen to it carefully and compare it to my video. I immediately realized they had used the same “Clarion Conspiracy” audio track and merely added additional sound effects…

If I had “used” their audio track for my video… how is it possible that my version is the clean version without any sound effects? Ask any audio engineer and they will tell you that it is impossible for me to remove the sound effects. That alone should prove that I did not infringe on SM Entertainment’s copyright.

The labeled “composer” of ‘Prologue’ is well known Korean composer Yoo Yong Jin, and his song is part of a K-pop CD now on sale and labeled as OST, or “Original Sound Track.” Since it’s a Digital Juice audio, selling it in an audio CD would clearly be a breach of Digital Juice’s end user agreement.

You can see “Prologue” on sale here and in iTunes.

I wrote to Digital Juice to tell them about my case, and the director immediately sent me a letter written on my behalf:

In the document, you can read that Digital Juice has called out SM Entertainment proving now that they are instead the ones who have breached copyrights and not me. What a turn of events.

The problem was that SM Entertainment has not bothered to reply to any of my emails and my YouTube account is due to receive a “strike”, which is a black mark on my record. I, therefore, had to withdraw my defense.

As of 19th Feb 2016, I finally received a reply from SM Entertainment and their reply left no contact person’s name or phone number. This is their reply:

Because of their “late reply” leaving me with only 2 more days to receive a “strike” against my account, I had to withdraw my dispute. This basically means that SM Entertainment still has the upper hand, that they are collecting any monetization from my account, and that there is still a record of my so-called “copyright infringement” in my YouTube account.

I would like to raise awareness over these issues:

1. The YouTube copyright system is seriously flawed and can be abused by people/companies simply wanting to take down some other’s work, as YouTube generally awards the claim to to the claimant.
2. A multi-million dollar company like SM Entertainment is selling what they claim to be OST (Original Sound Track) as labeled on their product, but all they did was re-packaged a stock audio from Digital Juice.
3. There is no way for innocent members of the public to defend against such false takedown notices should such companies decide to pursue the case to the fullest.

UPDATE

I had no choice but to leave my video with a false “strike” and let SM Entertainment monetize my video. It was only after some South Korean friends helped to contact SM Entertainment repeatedly and even got me a South Korean news coverage (https://weekly.donga.com/List/3/all/11/526913/1), was the copyright claim against me finally removed and my video restored. Several months later, the SM YouTube video featuring “Prologue” was removed.

My story was later also featured in Petapixel: https://petapixel.com/2016/02/20/how-i-turned-a-bs-youtube-copyright-claim-back-on-the-real-infringer/

Article Banner Graphics Attribution: poop icon by angyee

Related

Google Ads on DPRK 360

To date, 4 of my readers sent me messages regarding advertisements on my website. They felt that advertisements are a product of capitalism, are an eyesore, and that I should remove all advertising. While it is only a very small number that somehow felt irritated by Google Ads, I felt I should at least explain […]

Press Release Statement by Spokesperson for the National Coordination Committee for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

I received this press release from the Embassy of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in the Republic of Singapore. Download the original press release PDF here. Or read the press release below: Page 1 of Press Release Recently, the United States is letting loose an unheard-of vociferation about “cyber threat” from the DPRK.We know […]